From Tariffs to Turmoil: Spot Supply Chain Risk Before It Spreads

Last Updated: May 6, 2025

Everything is connected. A delay in one region can derail a production schedule on the other side of the world. A cyber incident at a vendor can escalate into a full-blown regulatory crisis. Supply chains are no longer just a logistics concern; they touch every part of the business. In a world shaped by geopolitical conflicts, volatile weather patterns, and economic uncertainty, companies can’t afford to manage risk in silos. Enterprise Risk Management (ERM), especially when supported by intelligent tools like Risk Ripple, helps organizations understand where they’re vulnerable and gives them the clarity to act.

Global Complexity, Local Consequences

Tariffs offer a clear example of how quickly disruption spreads through the supply chain. When the U.S. announced plans to increase tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and other goods, companies immediately started preparing for higher costs. According to the Associated Press, automakers, chipmakers, and even pharmaceutical companies warned that these price hikes would ripple across industries and ultimately affect consumers.

These tariffs don’t just raise sticker prices. They lead to lower consumer demand, paused production schedules, and growing uncertainty for companies already operating on tight margins. Even if your organization isn’t directly importing affected goods, your suppliers might be. Or their suppliers. The result is a layered chain reaction that touches everything from customer service and sales to inventory management and legal risk.

This is why a supply chain issue rarely stays in its lane. Risk ripples—quickly and quietly—through contracts, dependencies, and third-party relationships. Without connected insight, organizations miss the early warning signs. And by the time the problem becomes obvious, it’s already everywhere.

These moments show how tangled and fragile the system is. They also show why reacting isn’t enough. Companies need to see around corners, anticipate where those ripples will go, and act before damage spreads.

Take a risk-based approach to supply chain disruptions

Seeing the Bigger Picture: Risk Ripple, Unknown Knowns, and Small Disruptions

After walking through the ripple effects of something like tariffs, it is clear that not all risk is visible on the surface. Often, the earliest signs of disruption are subtle. They’re hidden in departmental silos, buried in email threads, or known only to one or two people who might not realize their relevance to the bigger picture. These are the “Unknown Knowns”—risks that someone, somewhere in the organization understands, but that don’t get shared with the people positioned to act.

This disconnect isn’t about carelessness. It’s about structure. Most organizations operate in a way that makes it hard to see how one action in a single department affects five others down the line. A late shipment might just seem like a procurement issue—until it delays production, upsets customers, and puts revenue at risk.

Risk Ripple exists to surface these kinds of hidden relationships. It uses generative AI to connect data points, people, and processes across departments and third parties. It doesn’t just show the problem—it helps teams understand how one small issue can create broader disruptions. Think of it as a map of interconnected risks that makes it easier to ask better questions: Who else does this affect? What other processes depend on this vendor? Are we already seeing warning signs in another area?

Take a missed quality check on a component sourced from a vendor who also handles sensitive data. What seems like a narrow operational issue could lead to legal exposure, reputational damage, or cybersecurity concerns. Risk Ripple doesn’t solve these problems—it helps you see them in time to do something about it.

By identifying these patterns early, organizations can focus their attention where it matters most. Not every issue needs escalation, but some do. The key is knowing which ones. Seeing the bigger picture makes that possible.

From Documentation to Direction: Why ERM Is a Better Path Forward

When unknown knowns stay buried, companies default to outdated tools to manage modern problems. Visibility gaps lead to missed warning signs, and what starts as a small disruption often becomes a much bigger one. After seeing how risk can ripple across systems, it’s clear that a better approach requires deeper insight and stronger alignment.

Traditional GRC frameworks focus on documenting what’s already happened—audits, checklists, and compliance reports. While that documentation matters, it won’t help you prepare for what’s coming next. It keeps teams focused on the past instead of what could go wrong tomorrow.

That’s where ERM makes the difference. A risk-based approach looks at the root causes of disruption and helps prioritize areas with the greatest exposure. ERM doesn’t live in one department. It connects the dots across the entire organization. Everyone, whether they’re in procurement, IT, finance, or compliance, plays a role in identifying and managing risk.

Let’s say your risk model picks up warning signs that a logistics partner might go under. With a traditional GRC approach, you might not notice until invoices go unpaid or shipments stall. With ERM, you already have the signals. Your team starts preparing early. Legal reviews contracts, procurement identifies backup vendors, and customer service prepares communications. The disruption never reaches your customers because you were ready before it became a crisis.

The Bottom Line

Supply chain disruption isn’t a temporary challenge—it’s a constant reality in a connected world. Risks rarely stay isolated. One issue can trigger a series of consequences across vendors, departments, and even industries. The ability to recognize those ripple effects early is no longer a competitive advantage; it’s a baseline requirement for resilience.

This doesn’t mean predicting every disruption. It means building systems and habits that help you spot patterns, surface hidden risks, and respond with clarity. Risk management shouldn’t sit on the sidelines. With ERM, it becomes part of how everyone makes decisions.

You don’t need to control everything. But you do need to see more clearly. Because when disruption hits—and it will—your ability to respond depends on what you saw coming.